ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Single-Sample Networks Reveal Intra-Cytoband Co-Expression Hotspots in Breast Cancer Subtypes.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- ssNetShift: single-sample metabolic network rewiring reveals hidden prognostic subtypes beyond clinical staging in gastric cancer.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MicroSSNet: an R package for microbial network construction and analysis at the single-sample and aggregated levels.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Loss of long-range co-expression is a common feature in cancer.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Pseudogene Coexpression Networks Reveal a Robust Prognostic Signature for Pediatric B-ALL Survival.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease comprising various subtypes with distinct molecular characteristics, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic responses. This heterogeneity evidences significant challenges for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Traditional genomic co-expression network analyses often overlook individual-specific interactions critical for personalized medicine. In this study, we employed single-sample gene co-expression network analysis to investigate the structural and functional genomic alterations across breast cancer subtypes (Luminal A, Luminal B, Her2-enriched, and Basal-like) and compared them with normal breast tissue. We utilized RNA-Seq gene expression data to infer gene co-expression networks. The LIONESS algorithm allowed us to construct individual networks for each patient, capturing unique co-expression patterns. We focused on the top 10,000 gene interactions to ensure consistency and robustness in our analysis. Network metrics were calculated to characterize the topological properties of both aggregated and single-sample networks. Our findings reveal significant fragmentation in the co-expression networks of breast cancer subtypes, marked by a change from interchromosomal (TRANS) to intrachromosomal (CIS) interactions. This transition indicates disrupted long-range genomic communication, leading to localized genomic regulation and increased genomic instability. Single-sample analyses confirmed that these patterns are consistent at the individual level, highlighting the molecular heterogeneity of breast cancer. Despite these pronounced alterations, the proportion of CIS interactions did not significantly correlate with patient survival outcomes across subtypes, suggesting limited prognostic value. Furthermore, we identified high-degree genes and critical cytobands specific to each subtype, providing insights into subtype-specific regulatory networks and potential therapeutic targets. These genes play pivotal roles in oncogenic processes and may represent important keys for targeted interventions. The application of single-sample co-expression network analysis proves to be a powerful tool for uncovering individual-specific genomic interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.