Edible Alginate-Lecithin Films Enriched with Different Coffee Bean Extracts: Formulation, Non-Cytotoxic, Anti-Inflammatory and Antimicrobial Properties.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Quercetin enhances the renoprotective effects of phosphodiesterase inhibitors by attenuating endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced cellular apoptosis via modulation of GRP75/CHOP/Bax/Bcl2 pathway.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026
   Article
2. Protective role of HOXB5-orchestrated mitochondrial homeostasis and mitophagy in cardiomyocytes after ischemia-reperfusion via transcriptionally activating Sirt5.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as