ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Prioritizing Computational Cocrystal Prediction Methods for Experimental Researchers: A Review to Find Efficient, Cost-Effective, and User-Friendly Approaches.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- ML-Driven Pharmaceutical Cocrystal Technology: Advances in Screening, Property Prediction and Applications.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Nano-cocrystals as Nanotechnology-based Approach to Modulate Solubility and Bioavailability of Poorly Soluble Drugs.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Novel Drug-Drug Cocrystalline Forms of Carbamazepine with Sulfacetamide: Preparation, Characterization, and In Vitro/In Vivo Performance Evaluation.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical cocrystals offer a versatile approach to enhancing the properties of drug compounds, making them an important tool in drug formulation and development by improving the therapeutic performance and patient experience of pharmaceutical products. The prediction of cocrystals involves using computational and theoretical methods to identify potential cocrystal formers and understand the interactions between the active pharmaceutical ingredient and coformers. This process aims to predict whether two or more molecules can form a stable cocrystal structure before performing experimental synthesis, thus saving time and resources. In this review, the commonly used cocrystal prediction methods are first overviewed and then evaluated based on three criteria: efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendliness. Based on these considerations, we suggest to experimental researchers without strong computational experiences which methods and tools should be tested as a first step in the workflow of rational design of cocrystals. However, the optimal choice depends on specific needs and resources, and combining methods from different categories can be a more powerful approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.