ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Gelatin-Modified Bioactive Glass for Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of dentin pre-treatment with Bioglass F18 suspensions on surface characteristics and bond strength of endodontic sealers.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When dentin is directly exposed to the oral cavity for various reasons, such as a lack of enamel on the tooth surface, external stimuli to the dentin often cause transient discomfort known as dentin hypersensitivity. In order to block the incoming stimulus signal, an ideal treatment is to induce the production of minerals to block the dentinal tubules. In this work, a dentin-desensitizing plugging material was prepared by modifying mesoporous bioactive glass with gelatin, the mineralization and desensitization effects of which were compared with Gluma in in vitro experiments. These experiments confirmed that gelatin-modified bioactive glass (MBG@PDA@Gel) is more effective than traditional desensitizing agents at blocking dentin tubules. Following the successful synthesis of MBG@PDA@Gel, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and other tests, the treatment of demineralized dentin with MBG@PDA@Gel demonstrated that the dentinal tubules were tightly blocked under scanning electron microscopy. MBG@PDA@Gel induces minerals in deeper layers of dentinal tubules, promoting remineralization and forming a unified structure with the tubule blockage. Animal studies showed that MBG@PDA@Gel can remineralize demineralized dentin, and it is stable in the oral cavity and does not fall out. MBG@PDA@Gel not only enhances the biocompatibility of the nanoparticle but also results in an overall uniform and rapid remineralization of the demineralized dentin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.