Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39595862›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2024

Efficacy of Back Bracing in Treating Chronic Low Back Pain.

John S Vick, Jessica Zimmerman, Stephanie Hicks, Abigail Biekert, Alaa Abd-Elsayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John S VickAssociated Physicians Group, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA.
Jessica ZimmermanAssociated Physicians Group, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA.
Stephanie HicksAssociated Physicians Group, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA.
Abigail BiekertAssociated Physicians Group, St. Louis, MO 63141, USA.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) negatively impacts quality of life and contributes to a significant economic burden. One conservative management strategy for CLBP is lumbar back bracing. Despite the benefits of back bracing for improving pain and function, there remains hesitance to use the therapy long term due to unfounded fear related to muscle weakness, deconditioning, or joint contracture.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the outcomes for patients with CLBP who were managed with lumbar back bracing and physical therapy.

methodsThis was a single-site, retrospective chart review.

resultsPatients were included in the study if they were treated for CLBP with back bracing for at least one hour daily and physical therapy for twelve weeks. Pain was assessed at three, six, and twelve months using the 11-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Function was assessed at three months using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The VAS score reduced from 6.28 +/- 2.32 to 3.96 +/- 2.66 at three months (

conclusionBack bracing in combination with physical therapy is effective for treating low back pain.

Indexed as

back bracingchronic painlow back painorthoses

Identifiers

PMID39595862
PMCPMC11591956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.