Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39595770›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Co-Production Within Academic Constraints: Insights from a Case Study.

Evelyn Callahan, Niamh Murtagh, Alison Pooley, Jenny Pannell, Alison Benzimra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Evelyn CallahanThe Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0360-4657
Niamh MurtaghThe Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-3606
Alison PooleySuffolk Sustainability Institute, University of Suffolk, Ipswich IP4 1QJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6441-6246
Jenny PannellThe Bartlett School of Sustainable Construction, University College London (UCL), London WC1E 7HB, UK.
Alison BenzimraUnited St Saviour's Charity, London SE1 3JW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4158-8472

Funding

Dunhill Medical Trust SLEF2110-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-production in research offers the potential for multiple benefits, including amplifying the voices of the marginalised, reducing power inequalities between academic researchers and co-researchers outside of academia, increased likelihood of impact, and improvement in the research process. But alongside increased interest in co-production, there is increased awareness of its contextual constraints. Key amongst these are institutional orthodoxies in academia, including time-limited, project-based research and precarious employment for junior researchers. To examine how the potential benefits of co-production can be achieved within the constraints of current academic systems, a case study project was assessed against a documented set of expectations for the co-production of research with older adults. The case study was a research project conducted with seven almshouse communities in England on the topic of social resilience. The wider almshouse communities-staff, trustees, and residents-were involved in co-production. The assessment concluded that co-production led to rich data and deep understanding. Co-production aided the development of skills and experiences of the co-researchers, resulted in changes in practice, and challenged power differentials, albeit in limited ways, but could not ensure the sustainability of relationships or impact. Key elements for effective co-production included the approach to and governance of the project, the formation of a Residents Advisory Group, and planning for the limited commitment that individuals and organisations outside of academia may be able to contribute to research.

Indexed as

AcademiaResearch PersonnelEnglandHumansalmshouseco-productionco-researchhousingpowersocial

Identifiers

PMID39595770
PMCPMC11593666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.