Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39595745›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Quantification of Visual Attention by Using Eye-Tracking Technology for Soundscape Assessment Through Physiological Response.

Hyun In Jo, Jin Yong Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hyun In JoDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-3352
Jin Yong JeonDepartment of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1469-4520

Funding

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI22C197300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because soundscapes affect human health and comfort, methodologies for evaluating them through physiological responses have attracted considerable attention. In this study, we proposed a novel method for evaluating visual attention by using eye-tracking technology to objectively assess soundscape perception. The study incorporated questionnaire surveys and physiological measurements focusing on visual attention responses. Results from the questionnaire indicated that perceptions of vehicles and the sky were 6% and 26% more sensitive, respectively, whereas perceptions of vegetation, based on physiological responses, were approximately 3% to 50% more sensitive. The soundscape quality prediction model indicates that the proposed methodology can complement conventional questionnaire-based models and provide a nuanced interpretation of eventfulness relationships. Additionally, the visual attention quantification technique enhanced the restoration responses of questionnaire-based methods by 1-2%. The results of this study are significant because the study introduces a novel methodology for quantifying visual attention, which can be used as a supplementary tool for physiological responses in soundscape research. The proposed method can uncover novel mechanisms of human perception of soundscapes that may not be captured by questionnaires, providing insights for future research in soundscape evaluation through physiological measurements.

Indexed as

AttentionEye-Tracking TechnologyAdultAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleNoiseSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual PerceptionYoung Adulteye trackingphysiological measurementpsychological restorationsoundscape qualityvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID39595745
PMCPMC11593826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.