ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024
Implementation and Baseline Evaluation of an Evidence-Based Group Antenatal Care Program in Two Nigerian States.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of group antenatal care on maternal health continuum of care and perinatal outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2026Pooled it
- Group antenatal care positively transforms the care experience: Results of an effectiveness trial in Malawi.PloS one · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of postnatal outcomes from a group antenatal care intervention in Nigeria: a quasi-experimental study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- "Each moon we come to weigh the pregnancy:" Exploring the experience of group antenatal care processes in Benin and their contributions to self-efficacy.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a group antenatal care intervention in two Northern Nigerian states: Quasi-experimental study.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Northern Nigeria has had historically low antenatal care (ANC) utilization rates with poor health outcomes. Previous studies have shown that group antenatal care (gANC) improves ANC behavior and pregnancy outcomes. The gANC has been adopted in Kaduna and Kano States, Nigeria. This paper presents baseline findings from the implementation of the gANC program in Kaduna and Kano States, Nigeria, based on data collected from 1269 and 1200 pregnant women, respectively, from March to April 2024. Analyses of sociodemographic and pregnancy behavior data were performed. Participants were mostly between the age of 19 and 31 years, married or living with a partner, with over 50% having their own businesses. Over 62% and 34% had completed secondary- or higher-level education, with 60% and 80% living in urban areas in Kaduna and Kano States, respectively. In Kano State, >60% of the women had their last delivery at home, with 41.6% not assisted by a skilled birth attendant. In Kaduna, >63% delivered in the hospital and >50% had skilled attendance during labor. Almost half had not used contraceptives previously. This study has provided baseline evaluation data for the implementation of gANC in two states in Nigeria. Subsequent longitudinal data will examine the impact of gANC utilization on perinatal outcomes and contraceptive behavior to inform the scaling of the program in the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.