ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024
Determinants of Length of Stay for Medical Inpatients Using Survival Analysis.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the increase in insured patients and an aging population, managing the length of stay (LOS) for inpatients has become crucial for controlling medical costs. Analyzing the factors influencing LOS is necessary for effective management. Previous studies often used multiple or logistic regression analyses, which have limitations such as unmet assumptions and the inability to handle time-dependent variables. To address these issues, this study applied survival analysis to examine the factors affecting LOS using the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) sample cohort data from 2016 to 2019, covering over 4 million records. We used Kaplan-Meier survival estimation to assess LOS probabilities based on sociodemographic, patient, health checkup, and institutional characteristics. Additionally, the Cox proportional hazards model controlled for confounding factors, providing more robust validation. Key findings include the influence of age, gender, type of insurance, and hospital type on LOS. For instance, older patients and medical aid recipients had longer LOS, while general hospitals showed shorter stays. This study is the first in Korea to use survival analysis with a large cohort database to identify LOS determinants. The results provide valuable insights for shaping healthcare policies aimed at optimizing inpatient care and managing hospital resources more efficiently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.