Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39595671›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Examining Indigenous Identity as a Protective Factor in Mental Well-Being Research in the United States: A Scoping Review.

William Oyenque Carson, Caleigh Curley, Renée Goldtooth-Halwood, Deborah Jean McClelland, Stephanie Russo Carroll, Nicole P Yuan, Scott Carvajal, Felina M Cordova-Marks

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Measuring Indigenous Cultural Strengths: a Systematic Review of a Decade of Approaches.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

William Oyenque CarsonLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-7088
Caleigh CurleyLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2395-7361
Renée Goldtooth-HalwoodLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Deborah Jean McClellandLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Stephanie Russo CarrollLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8996-8071
Nicole P YuanLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2441-4692
Scott CarvajalLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.
Felina M Cordova-MarksLands of the O'odham and Yaqui Peoples, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3317-5945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to historical and ongoing structural racism and settler colonialism, Indigenous Peoples and communities in the United States are at a higher risk for a variety of diseases, elevated stress, and negative mental health outcomes. In addition, the United States federal government and the public encourage a view that Indigenous Peoples are primarily a racial group. Federally-, state-, and un-recognized Indigenous Peoples have a collective right to self-determination and sovereignty, and individuals of these Peoples understand this. The goals of this scoping review were to examine what research on identity and mental well-being is currently being conducted with Indigenous populations in the United States, synthesize the results, and determine if researchers are utilizing toolsets and theories that reinforce the sovereignty of Indigenous Peoples, communities, and the individual. The scoping review followed guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute guide for Scoping Reviews and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Four databases and over six thousand articles were searched for this review, with twenty-four that had data extracted and analyzed. Current research on the relationship between Indigenous identity and mental well-being shows mixed results. The findings of this scoping review highlight a need for Indigenous-specific tools for measuring identity in place of tools used for other ethnic and racial groups. More research must be conducted to create tools that specifically examine the phenomena of United States-based Indigenous identity.

Indexed as

Mental HealthHumansIndigenous PeoplesProtective FactorsSocial IdentificationUnited StatesAmerican Indian/Alaska Nativeblood quantumIndigenous identityIndigenous theorymental well-beingself-determinationsovereignty

Identifiers

PMID39595671
PMCPMC11594160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.