ReviewBiomolecules2024
Neuroradiological Findings in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy with a Particular Consideration of the Boston Criteria 2.0: An Imaging Review.
Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the elderly, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is the most common cause for intracranial lobar hemorrhages. CAA is caused by the accumulation of amyloid-β fibrils in cortical and leptomeningeal vessels. In 2022, the Boston Criteria 2.0 became the new diagnostic standard for CAA, following the Modified Boston Criteria of 2010. The diagnostic criteria are a composite of clinical, imaging and histopathological findings. In the latest version of the Boston Criteria, neuroradiological imaging findings were even expanded compared to the previous version. Crucially, the correct application of the diagnostic criteria is necessary to avoid over- and underdiagnosis. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the diagnostic criteria for CAA with an emphasis on typical imaging findings which are part of the Boston Criteria 2.0 and other imaging findings suggestive of CAA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.