Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39595624›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2024

Visualization Methods for DNA Sequences: A Review and Prospects.

Tan Li, Mengshan Li, Yan Wu, Yelin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tan LiSchool of Physics and Electronic Information, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China.
Mengshan LiSchool of Physics and Electronic Information, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China.
Yan WuSchool of Mathematics and Computer Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China.
Yelin LiSchool of Physics and Electronic Information, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42061067National Natural Science Foundation of China 51663001National Natural Science Foundation of China 52063002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient analysis and interpretation of biological sequence data remain major challenges in bioinformatics. Graphical representation, as an emerging and effective visualization technique, offers a more intuitive method for analyzing DNA sequences. However, many visualization approaches are dispersed across research databases, requiring urgent organization, integration, and analysis. Additionally, no single visualization method excels in all aspects. To advance these methods, knowledge graphs and advanced machine learning techniques have become key areas of exploration. This paper reviews the current 2D and 3D DNA sequence visualization methods and proposes a new research direction focused on constructing knowledge graphs for biological sequence visualization, explaining the relevant theories, techniques, and models involved. Additionally, we summarize machine learning techniques applicable to sequence visualization, such as graph embedding methods and the use of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for processing graphical representations. These machine learning techniques and knowledge graphs aim to provide valuable insights into computational biology, bioinformatics, genomic computing, and evolutionary analysis. The study serves as an important reference for improving intelligent search systems, enriching knowledge bases, and enhancing query systems related to biological sequence visualization, offering a comprehensive framework for future research.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDNAMachine LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSequence Analysis, DNADNAcomputational biologygraphical representationknowledge graphmachine learningvisualization method

Identifiers

PMID39595624
PMCPMC11592258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.