ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Factors Associated with the Practice of Assessing Drug-Drug Interactions Among Pharmacists in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-Drug Interaction Knowledge, Practices, and Barriers in Community Pharmacies: A Cross-Sectional Study from Jazan Region, Saudi Arabia.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers toward drug-drug interaction management among pharmacists in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Evaluation of community pharmacists' knowledge and real-world practices in drug interaction management: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Drug-Drug Interaction Management Among Pharmacists in Jordan: A National Comparative Survey.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancing drug-drug interactions research: integrating AI-powered prediction, vulnerable populations, and regulatory insights.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug-drug interactions (DDIs) occur when two or more drugs are administered concomitantly, changing the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a drug's characteristics. Despite the advances in health technology, DDIs remain a concern to patient safety. This study aimed to (1) assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of hospital and community pharmacists toward DDIs in Saudi Arabia and (2) examine factors associated with their practice.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using an online self-administered questionnaire targeting hospital and community pharmacists working in Saudi Arabia. The study questionnaire consisted of five sections: demographics, knowledge, attitude, and practice toward DDIs, as well as pharmacy characteristics. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of participants as count and percentage. Chi-square tests were used to examine associations between practice variables and other independent variables.
resultsA total of 131 pharmacists participated in the study. The majority were males (81.7%), aged 26-35 years (64.9%), and worked in community pharmacies (81.7%). Nearly half of the participants reported optimal practice regarding checking drug interactions before dispensing any drug. Factors associated with the practice of checking DDIs were found to be gender, perceived workload, perceived knowledge, and attitude variables. Regarding the practice of asking patients about their prescription and OTC drugs, there were statistically significant differences between hospital and community pharmacists.
conclusionsOur findings on both community and hospital pharmacists in Saudi Arabia reveal that pharmacists' attitudes and perceived knowledge might influence the practice of pharmacists toward DDIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.