ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Development and Validation of a Visualized Posture Risk Assessment Questionnaire for Low Back Pain in Daily Activities: A Study in Taiwan.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesA proper posture is essential for musculoskeletal health, and a poor posture can lead to low back pain. To address the limitations of traditional text-based questionnaires, this study developed and validated a visualized posture assessment questionnaire for evaluating daily postures related to low back pain. The questionnaire was administered in Taiwan and designed using Traditional Chinese language.
methodsThe proposed questionnaire evaluates six categories of daily activities including lifting heavy objects, sitting, putting on shoes, face washing and tooth brushing, getting out of bed, and doing sit-ups, or similar actions. Each category comprises an ergonomic posture and a non-ergonomic posture with corresponding illustrations. The questionnaire was administered to 100 participants, and its internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach's α, while test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). An expert panel reviewed the content validity, and the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) was calculated for each item and illustration.
resultsTesting revealed a Cronbach's α of 0.808, indicating high internal consistency, and a test-retest reliability, as measured by ICCs, of 0.78, indicating high stability over time. The I-CVI scores were high across all items, with the illustrations unanimously rated by the experts as highly relevant, supporting the effectiveness of the questionnaire's visualized format for enhanced comprehension.
conclusionsThe proposed questionnaire exhibits high reliability and validity, rendering it effective in evaluating posture-related risks of low back pain. This questionnaire also offers a more accessible and intuitive alternative to text-based questionnaires, with potential applications in clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.