Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39595329›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Boiling Time to Estimated Stunning and Death of Decapod Crustaceans of Different Sizes and Shapes.

Henrik Lauridsen, Aage Kristian Olsen Alstrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henrik LauridsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8833-4456
Aage Kristian Olsen AlstrupDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-0084-9122

Funding

Carlsberg Foundation CF21-0605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The best practice for killing decapod crustaceans lacking a centralized ganglion has been debated for a century. Currently, there is a movement away from live boiling towards electrocution and mechanical splitting or spiking, which are efficient in the large commercial setting but may be unavailable and impractical for small decapods such as shrimp and prawn in the small-scale setting of, e.g., the household. Here, using carcasses of varying sizes of prawn, crayfish, lobster and green and brown crab, we used micro-CT imaging to measure surface area and sphericity in relation to body mass. Then, we measured heating profiles at the anterior ganglion and in the core of carcasses of the same species when exposed to standardized boiling regimes. We found a relationship with positive allometry between surface area and body mass for all species and a decrease in sphericity with mass. Heating times until proposed stunning (26 °C) and killing (44 °C) varied with body size and starting temperature and exceeded minutes for larger species. For a small species like prawn, times to stunning and killing by boiling are comparable to electrocution times and within the acceptable range compared to recreational killing of other sentient beings such as game mammals.

Indexed as

allometryboilingcrustaceaDecapodaeuthanasiaheatinghumane killingmicro-CTsphericitysurface area

Identifiers

PMID39595329
PMCPMC11591275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.