ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Exploring the Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Rhinovirus Infection in Hospitalized Children Compared with Other Respiratory Viruses.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Symptom-based diagnostic models for common respiratory viral infections: a machine learning and natural language processing study.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
- Severe pneumococcal pneumonia with human rhinovirus/enterovirus coinfection leading to sepsis in a welder: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors for progression to bronchitis or pneumonia in hospitalized children with human rhinovirus infection: a retrospective cohort study using machine learning.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of human rhinovirus in hospitalized children and adolescents with acute respiratory infections: a longitudinal study in Shenzhen, China (2019-2024).Virology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute viral respiratory tract infections constitute a significant challenge in pediatric healthcare globally, with rhinovirus representing one of the primary etiological agents. In this context, we conducted a study with the objective of identifying the clinical characteristics and outcomes of rhinovirus infection in comparison with other respiratory viruses in children hospitalized in one of the largest pediatric hospitals in the capital of Romania.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study among children hospitalized for influenza-like illness symptoms and who were tested by multiplex RT-PCR with a nasopharyngeal swab between May 2020 and December 2021.
resultsA total of 496 children were eligible for inclusion in the study, and the positivity rate for at least one virus was 58.5%. The rhinovirus was identified in 138 patients (median age 12.5 months), representing 27.8% of all children tested and 49.3% of all positive samples. Although the clinical features of children with rhinovirus were dominated by cough (63.7%) and dyspnea (51.6%), no symptoms were identified that were strongly associated with rhinovirus infection in comparison to other respiratory viruses. The probability of receiving an antibiotic prescription was 1.92 times lower (
conclusionsRhinovirus was the most prevalent virus identified in children hospitalized with influenza-like illness symptoms. The utilization of multiplex RT-PCR molecular tests is instrumental in elucidating etiology with precision and implementation of these advanced diagnostic methods, which can bring significant benefits in practice. A positive result for rhinovirus helps to reduce the unnecessary administration of antibiotics and optimizes patient management, thus decreasing the risk of severe complications such as acute respiratory failure and acute otitis media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.