Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594874›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Digital Device Usage and Childhood Cognitive Development: Exploring Effects on Cognitive Abilities.

Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez, Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco, Silvia Herrero-Roldán, Stephanie Rodriguez-Besteiro, Ismael Martínez-Guardado, Alexandra Martín-Rodríguez, Jose Francisco Tornero-Aguilera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Unfiltered Access, Unseen Harms: A Developmental and Public Health Critique of Digital Rights Discourse.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vicente Javier Clemente-SuárezFaculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2397-2801
Ana Isabel Beltrán-VelascoPsychology Department, Faculty of Life and Natural Sciences, Nebrija University, 28240 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9893-0227
Silvia Herrero-RoldánFaculty of Applied Social Sciences and Communications, International Business University, UNIE, 28015 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5154-089X
Stephanie Rodriguez-BesteiroFaculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0142-4991
Ismael Martínez-GuardadoLFE Research Group, Department of Health and Human Performance, Faculty of Physical Activity and SportScience (INEF), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Calle de Martín Fierro, 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3557-9767
Alexandra Martín-RodríguezFaculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0087-4379
Jose Francisco Tornero-AguileraFaculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, 28670 Villaviciosa de Odón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0747-8133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing ubiquity of digital devices in childhood had outpaced the understanding of their effects on cognitive development, creating a significant research gap regarding their long-term impact.

objectiveThe present narrative overview explored the complex relationship between digital device usage and cognitive development in childhood.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, to critically assess cognitive domains such as attention, memory, executive functions, problem-solving skills, and social cognition. Incorporating over 157 peer-reviewed studies published between 2001 and 2024, we used strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure scientific rigor.

resultsThe review integrated empirical findings with established theoretical frameworks, particularly from cognitive development and media psychology, to highlight both the advantages and risks of early, frequent exposure to technology. The potential for digital devices to enhance cognitive skills, such as multitasking and information processing, was weighed against risks such as cognitive overload, diminished attention spans, and impaired social skills. We also examined psychological and behavioral outcomes, including identity formation, emotional regulation, and maladaptive behaviors associated with excessive screen time. Additionally, we identified strategies to mitigate negative effects, emphasizing structured digital engagement and parental involvement to support healthy cognitive and psychological growth. Our findings provided actionable recommendations for parents, educators, and policymakers, promoting optimal digital practices that enhanced cognitive development while safeguarding against potential harms.

conclusionsThe review offered essential insights for stakeholders in child development, education, and policy-making, highlighting the need for balanced integration of digital tools in childhood learning environments.

Indexed as

attentionchildhood cognitive developmentdigital device usageeducational technologyexecutive functionsmemorypsychological resilience

Identifiers

PMID39594874
PMCPMC11592547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.