ArticleCancers2024
Lung and Colon Cancer Detection Using a Deep AI Model.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-cancer homologous recombination deficiency prediction from whole slide images using transfer learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MLHNet-Lung: an attention-guided multi-level CNN-transformer fusion framework with CBAM and GeM pooling for explainable multiclass lung CT image classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Hybrid deep learning with attention fusion for enhanced colon cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Lightweight Cross-Gated Dual-Branch Attention Network for Colon and Lung Cancer Diagnosis from Histopathological Images.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE HISTOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF COLON CANCER: A RAY OF HOPE.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lung and colon cancers are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early and accurate detection of these cancers is crucial for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes. False or incorrect detection is harmful. Accurately detecting cancer in a patient's tissue is crucial to their effective treatment. While analyzing tissue samples is complicated and time-consuming, deep learning techniques have made it possible to complete this process more efficiently and accurately. As a result, researchers can study more patients in a shorter amount of time and at a lower cost. Much research has been conducted to investigate deep learning models that require great computational ability and resources. However, none of these have had a 100% accurate detection rate for these life-threatening malignancies. Misclassified or falsely detecting cancer can have very harmful consequences. This research proposes a new lightweight, parameter-efficient, and mobile-embedded deep learning model based on a 1D convolutional neural network with squeeze-and-excitation layers for efficient lung and colon cancer detection. This proposed model diagnoses and classifies lung squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinoma of the lung and colon from digital pathology images. Extensive experiment demonstrates that our proposed model achieves 100% accuracy for detecting lung, colon, and lung and colon cancers from the histopathological (LC25000) lung and colon datasets, which is considered the best accuracy for around 0.35 million trainable parameters and around 6.4 million flops. Compared with the existing results, our proposed architecture shows state-of-the-art performance in lung, colon, and lung and colon cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.