Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594810›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Diagnosis and Evaluation by Flow Cytometry.

Feras Ally, Xueyan Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic Concordance and Superiority of Flow Cytometry Over Immunohistochemistry in Acute Leukemia Immunophenotyping: A Single-Center Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  3. Optimizing limited antibody panels for efficient hematological disorders diagnosis by flow cytometry in resource-constrained setting.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Feras AllyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Xueyan ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent technological advances and significant progress in understanding the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the updated fifth edition WHO Classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the newly introduced International Consensus Classification (ICC), as well as the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations in 2022, require the integration of immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and molecular data, alongside clinical and morphologic findings, for accurate diagnosis, prognostication, and guiding therapeutic strategies in AML. Flow cytometry offers rapid and sensitive immunophenotyping through a multiparametric approach and is a pivotal laboratory tool for the classification of AML, identification of therapeutic targets, and monitoring of measurable residual disease (MRD) post therapy. The association of immunophenotypic features and recurrent genetic abnormalities has been recognized and applied in informing further diagnostic evaluation and immediate therapeutic decision-making. Recently, the evolving role of machine learning models in assisting flow cytometric data analysis for the automated diagnosis and prediction of underlying genetic alterations has been illustrated.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiaflow cytometrygenetic aberrationsimmunophenotypemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39594810
PMCPMC11592599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.