ArticleCancers2024
Real-World Outcomes of Selective
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Non-Molecularly Targeted Therapies: A Real-World Benchmark in Europe from the RECALIB-RET Study.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- The Utility of Tissue-Agnostic Drugs in Lung Cancer Treatment.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2025Review
- Selpercatinib in the treatment of thyroid cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study described real-world patient characteristics and outcomes among selpercatinib-treated patients in the United States, using the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived deidentified database (FHD) for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC) and Optum's de-identified Clinformatics
methodsPatients initiating selpercatinib treatment between 08MAY2020 and 30JUN2023 were included. We evaluated real-world time to selpercatinib treatment discontinuation or death (rwTTDd) and time to next treatment or death (rwTTNTd) using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was estimated as a measure of medication adherence in CDM patients.
resultsIn a/mNSCLC patients from the FHD (N = 68), the median rwTTDd and rwTTNTd were 22.4 [95%CI: 13.3-NR] and 21.0 [95%CI: 11.6-NR] months, respectively. In CDM, these durations were 12.1 [95%CI: 9.6-NR] and 16.2 [95%CI: 9.6-NR] months for lung cancer (n = 43), while these were not reached for thyroid cancer (n = 24) patients. The median MPR was 0.98 [IQR: 0.84-1.00] among all patients in the CDM (N = 75), with 77.3% of patients adhering (MPR ≥ 0.80) to selpercatinib.
conclusionsReal-world outcomes in this older and frailer patient cohort align with phase 3 trial results, further supporting selpercatinib as the standard of care for patients with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.