Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594777›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Tracing Quiescent Cancer Cells In Vivo.

Moon Jong Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Emerging Role of the DREAM Complex in Cancer and Therapeutic Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Moon Jong KimDepartment of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7876-4639

Funding

the Korean government (MSIT) NRF-2022R1F1A1074582, NRF-2019R1A6A3A03033443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

QCCs have long gained significant interest as potential "seeds" for recurrent cancers. Clinical evidence suggests that a subset of cancer cells exits the cell cycle and enters a quiescent state following anti-cancer treatment. These microscopic-residual QCCs are extremely challenging to trace and detect within patients. Additionally, QCCs resist conventional anti-cancer therapies due to the lack of cell activity. Notably, upon the unknown environmental cues in unknown time points, sometimes decades later, QCCs can reactivate, triggering cancer relapse at primary or secondary sites. Currently, no targeted therapies or diagnostic tools exist for QCCs, and their molecular regulatory mechanisms remain largely unknown. The major challenge in understanding QCCs lies in the limited availability of human-relevant pre-clinical models that trace and collect QCCs in vivo. This review provides an overview of existing QCC tracing systems and analyzes their limitations. It also cautiously proposes potential improvements for tracing QCCs in vivo based on recent advancements in QCC studies and lineage-tracing techniques. Developing human-relevant and easily accessible in vivo tracing systems will be a crucial step in advancing QCC diagnostics and therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

cancer recurrencein vivo mouse modelminimal residual diseasequiescent cancer cells (QCCs)tracing QCCs

Identifiers

PMID39594777
PMCPMC11593267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.