A Contemporary Review of Robotic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Global research trends in robot-assisted hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a visualized bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
   Article
2. Comparison of robotic and open liver resections for primary liver tumors: a multicenter retrospective analysis of perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality.Surgical endoscopy · 2026
   Article
3. Transforming liver cancer care: long-term outcomes of robotic liver resection for hepatocellular cancer.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026
   Article
4. Robotic segment III liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in the setting of Cruveilhier-Baumgarten syndrome: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as