ReviewCells2024
Unlocking Potential: A Comprehensive Overview of Cell Culture Banks and Their Impact on Biomedical Research.
Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterisation of Lates calcarifer primary myoblast proliferation and differentiation from direct cell isolation.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2026Article
- Cryopreservation of brain organoids - a tool for on-demand organoid banking.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Taking High-Tech to the Field: Leukemia Diagnosis in Pediatric Mexican Patients from Vulnerable and Remote Regions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Cell Membrane-coated Nanovaccines in Anti-tumor Immunotherapy.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Genetic and Molecular Characterization Confirms Hepatic Stellate Cell Origin of the Immortal Col-GFP HSC Line.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Misidentified cell lines: failures of peer review, varying journal responses to misidentification inquiries, and strategies for safeguarding biomedical research.Research integrity and peer review · 2025Article
- Viral contamination in cell culture: analyzing the impact of Epstein Barr virus and Ovine Herpesvirus 2.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell culture banks play a crucial role in advancing biomedical research by providing standardized, reproducible biological materials essential for various applications, from drug development to regenerative medicine. This opinion article presents a comprehensive overview of cell culture banks, exploring their establishment, maintenance, and characterization processes. The significance of ethical considerations and regulatory frameworks governing the use of cell lines is discussed, emphasizing the importance of quality control and validation in ensuring the integrity of research outcomes. Additionally, the diverse types of cell culture banks-primary cells, immortalized cell lines, and stem cells-and their specific contributions to different fields such as cancer research, virology, and tissue engineering are examined. The impact of technological advancements on cell banking practices is also highlighted, including automation and biobanking software that enhance efficiency and data management. Furthermore, challenges faced by researchers in accessing high-quality cell lines are addressed, along with proposed strategies for improving collaboration between academic institutions and commercial entities. By unlocking the potential of cell culture banks through these discussions, this article aims to underline their indispensable role in driving innovation within biomedical research and fostering future discoveries that could lead to significant therapeutic breakthroughs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.