Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594413›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Can the Ability to Play Steady Beats Be Indicative of Cognitive Aging? Using a Beat Processing Device.

Hyun Ju Chong, Jin Hee Choi, Ga Eul Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyun Ju ChongDepartment of Music Therapy, Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9788-0320
Jin Hee ChoiEwha Music Wellness Research Center, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7426-8267
Ga Eul YooDepartment of Music Therapy, Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2924-3009

Funding

the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2107S1A5A2A01025040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine whether different rhythm idioms significantly affect the reproduction accuracy of older adults and whether the participants' age and personal current engagement in music affect their ability to reproduce rhythm. A total of 79 older adults participated in the study. Participants were required to reproduce six different rhythm idioms, and their accuracy in rhythm reproduction was measured using the R index. The data were analyzed considering the participants' age sub-group and current engagement in music. The findings showed differences in reproduction accuracy across various rhythm idioms, particularly in relation to steady recurring notes and dotted notes with different intervals. The highest reproduction accuracy was found for the isochronous beat pattern, while the rhythm idiom starting with longer intervals yielded the lowest accuracy. Age and current personal engagement in music did not significantly affect rhythm performance. However, the study identified a significant correlation between decreased accuracy in reproducing a steady rhythm and diminished general cognitive ability. This study indicates that rhythm performance can be indicative of cognitive abilities related to temporal information processing. The findings support the potential use of rhythm tasks to evaluate cognitive performance in older adults with varying cognitive levels.

Indexed as

cognitive agingolder adultsrhythm idiomrhythm reproductiontemporal processing

Identifiers

PMID39594413
PMCPMC11590993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.