Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594404›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Metacognition About Collaborative Learning: Students' Beliefs Are Inconsistent with Their Learning Preferences.

Yunfeng Wei, Nicholas C Soderstrom, Michelle L Meade, Brandon G Scott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yunfeng WeiDepartment of Psychology, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173440, Bozeman, MT 59717-3440, USA.
Nicholas C SoderstromDepartment of Psychology, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173440, Bozeman, MT 59717-3440, USA.
Michelle L MeadeDepartment of Psychology, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173440, Bozeman, MT 59717-3440, USA.
Brandon G ScottDepartment of Psychology, Montana State University, P.O. Box 173440, Bozeman, MT 59717-3440, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration plays an important role in educational contexts. However, little is known about students' metacognitive beliefs about collaboration. The present study used an online survey to investigate students' beliefs toward group study/recall, their studying preferences, strategies they use when studying individually and in groups, and important characteristics of their group members. Results indicate that, although students generally perceive collaboration as beneficial, they prefer individual study, indicating that their beliefs are inconsistent with their learning preferences. Students report social learning as the primary reason for collaborative benefits but prefer to study alone to minimize distraction and increase personal accountability. Further, they use different strategies when studying individually or in a group. When studying individually, students most frequently report re-reading their notes. However, when studying in groups, students most frequently use strategies emphasizing collaboration and interaction, such as quizzing each other. Also, students prefer to work with group members who are focused, motivated, and hard working. Students' beliefs, preferences, and favored characteristics of group members are related to their frequency of using study groups. Students' metacognitive beliefs about collaboration have implications for theories of self-regulated learning and better use of collaboration in educational contexts.

Indexed as

collaborationcollaborative memorylearningmetacognitionstrategy

Identifiers

PMID39594404
PMCPMC11591187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.