Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594298›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Growing Greener: Cultivating Organisational Sustainability Through Leadership Development.

Sarah Lily Resanovich, Tim Hopthrow, Georgina Randsley de Moura

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah Lily ResanovichSchool of Psychology, The Centre for the Study of Group Processes, Canterbury CT2 7NP, UK.
Tim HopthrowSchool of Psychology, The Centre for the Study of Group Processes, Canterbury CT2 7NP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2331-7150
Georgina Randsley de MouraSchool of Psychology, The Centre for the Study of Group Processes, Canterbury CT2 7NP, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisations significantly contribute to climate change, making them essential targets for climate mitigation strategies. There is an opportunity to curb organisations' environmental impact by increasing the amount of pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) among employees. Many social and psychological factors impact an employee's likelihood of performing PEBs. Among social-psychological factors influencing employee PEB, leadership is unique as it is a social-psychological factor that can control or influence other factors. Leadership makes performing PEBs at work and home different. Due to its unique position, leadership has garnered attention from practitioners and researchers for how it can affect organisational environmental sustainability. There is limited research focusing on how leadership development can promote employee PEB, thereby increasing organisational environmental sustainability. Researchers conducted a narrative review that provided an overview of how leadership uniquely affects employee PEB, bringing together findings from various fields. Through this review, the authors propose the ICERR model for leadership development, which outlines five key capability areas and three desired outcomes for leadership development related to environmental sustainability. This model consists of 14 proposals that provide a framework for future research and identify critical areas for leadership development programmes looking to impact environmental sustainability.

Indexed as

behaviour changeenvironmental sustainability leadershipleadership developmentorganisational sustainabilitypro-environmental behaviours

Identifiers

PMID39594298
PMCPMC11591339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.