ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Agreement Between Resting Energy Expenditure Predictive Formulas and Indirect Calorimetry in Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe gold standard method for measuring resting energy expenditure (REE) is indirect calorimetry (IC) using an expensive device that requires specialized training. To overcome the limitations of IC, REE prediction formulas are used in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, it is still controversial which of these formulas has greater accuracy compared to IC. We aimed to determine the accuracies of REE measured by IC and estimated by formulas in patients with CKD.
methodsFifty-three patients with stage 4-5 CKD underwent IC and five current REE prediction formulas. Accuracy was measured by Lin's correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman repeated measures analysis was used to assess the agreement of the formulas' results with those of IC. Precision was measured by the predicted IC ± 10% and 20%. Systematic bias was assessed by the Student's t-test, and linear regression was used to assess proportionality bias.
resultsPatients had a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 12 ± 4 mL/min/1.73 m
conclusionsThe Fernandes and Cols equation had good accuracy and was valuable for estimating energy requirements in the population studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.