ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Systematic Review of AI-Assisted MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Enhancing Accuracy Through Second Opinion Tools.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Imaging for Predicting Preoperative Extraprostatic Extension in Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Multicentre evaluation of artificial intelligence risk classification for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI.European radiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of AI-powered prostate MRI against biopsy ground truth: quasi-continuous risk scoring versus fixed PI-RADS thresholds.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Patients with high-risk features on active surveillance for prostate cancer.Prostate international · 2026Review
- From prostate-specific antigen to precision: The future of prostate cancer diagnosis with artificial intelligence, biomarkers, and imaging.Current urology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in urological malignancy diagnosis and prognosis: current status and future prospects.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Current state of the art of new prostate MRI technologies and potential future developments.BJR open · 2026Review
- PRAD-Hybrid CNN (PRADHC): A Deep Learning Model for Assisted Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on MRICurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in MRI-Guided Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Addressing Key Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Application of Surface Luminance Distribution Measurements to the Evaluation of Neoplastic Lesions of the Prostate Gland.Cancers · 2025Article
- Prostate cancer diagnostics: the independent and combined roles of SelectMDx and mpMRI.Central European journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide, making accurate diagnosis critical for effective treatment. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have shown promise in improving the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer.
objectivesThis systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-based tools in diagnosing prostate cancer using MRI, with a focus on accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and clinical utility compared to conventional diagnostic methods.
methodsA comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore for studies published between 2019 and 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on full-text, English-language studies involving AI for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) -based prostate cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic performance metrics such as area under curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed, with risk of bias assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.
resultsSeven studies met the inclusion criteria, employing various AI techniques, including deep learning and machine learning. These studies reported improved diagnostic accuracy (with AUC scores of up to 97%) and moderate sensitivity, with performance varying based on training data quality and lesion characteristics like Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores.
conclusionsAI has significant potential to enhance prostate cancer diagnosis, particularly when used for second opinions in MRI interpretations. While these results are promising, further validation in diverse populations and clinical settings is necessary to fully integrate AI into standard practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.