ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Disability and Patient-Reported Satisfaction in Women with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Comparative Study of Venous Sinus Stenting and Medical Management.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebral Venous Insufficiency as a Contributing Factor in Dementia: An Emerging Hypothesis.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Animal Models and Venous Sinus Stenting: Status of Disease and Device-Focused Evidence.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatients with chronic idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) commonly experience a high level of disability and low satisfaction with medical treatment. We aim to evaluate long-term functional improvement and patient satisfaction in IIH patients with similar symptoms by comparing venous sinus stenting (VSS) to standard medical therapy.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 111 IIH patients, comparing 37 adult female patients who underwent venous sinus stenting with 74 patients treated medically. Propensity score matching was used to balance age and presence of papilledema at presentation between groups. Headache-related disability was evaluated using the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), while general function and treatment satisfaction were assessed using custom questionnaires. Electronic medical records and the results of imaging upon diagnosis were reviewed retrospectively.
resultsThe stented group reported significantly better outcomes in physical well-being (median 4.0 vs. 1.0,
conclusionCerebral venous stenting in patients with IIH is associated with lower disability and higher patient satisfaction from medical treatment compared to those treated with medications only. These findings suggest that venous sinus stenting may be a valuable treatment option for selected IIH patients. However, larger prospective studies are needed to further validate our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.