Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594236›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Dermoscopy Training Course Improves Ophthalmologists' Accuracy in Diagnosing Atypical Pigmented Periorbital Skin Lesions.

Giovanni Rubegni, Alessandra Cartocci, Linda Tognetti, Matteo Orione, Caterina Gagliano, Tommaso Bacci, Antonio Tarantello, Nicola Lo Russo, Mario Fruschelli, Niccolò Castellino and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Giovanni RubegniOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Alessandra CartocciDermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1818-6275
Linda TognettiDermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-4310
Matteo OrioneDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Caterina GaglianoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Tommaso BacciOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7477-2263
Antonio TarantelloOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Nicola Lo RussoOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Mario FruschelliOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3869-8593
Niccolò CastellinoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Ernesto De PianoDermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8139-1204
Martina D'OnghiaDermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8315-3413
Gabriele CeveniniDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Teresio AvitabileDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Pietro RubegniDermatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.
Alessio LuschiDepartment of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7615-9187
Gian Marco TosiOphthalmology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesFacial pigmented skin lesions are extremely common, starting from the fourth to fifth decades, especially in South-European countries, often located in the periorbital region. These include malignant forms, Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), characterized by growing incidence, and a series of benign simulators, including solar lentigo (SL), pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK), seborrheic keratosis (SK) and lichen planus-like keratosis (LPK). The clinical differential diagnosis of atypical pigmented skin lesions (aPFLs) can be difficult, even for dermatologists, leading to inappropriate skin biopsies with consequent aesthetic impacts. Dermoscopy of the facial area is a specific dermoscopic field that requires dedicated training and proved to increase diagnostic accuracy in dermatologists. Since these lesions are often seen by ophthalmologists at first, we aimed to evaluate the effect of a focused dermoscopy training course on a group of ophthalmologists naïve to the use of a dermatoscope.

methodsA set of 80 periorbital pigmented skin lesions with both clinical and dermoscopic images was selected and evaluated by six ophthalmologists before and after a one-day intensive dermoscopic training course. They were required to evaluate 80 periorbital lesions one month before and after a one-day intensive dermoscopic training course, illustrating second-level diagnostic options such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), obtaining a total of 480 evaluations. Specifically, they had to provide, for each case, a punctual diagnosis and a management option among dermoscopic follow-up/skin biopsy/RCM/LC-OCT. Descriptive statistics were carried out, and the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), and specificity (SP), with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), were estimated.

resultsIn the pre-course test, ophthalmologists achieved 84.0% SP, 33.3% SE and 63.7% ACC, while after the course, SE increased by +9% (i.e., 41.7%), SP decreased by 4%, and ACC remained comparable, i.e., 64.6%. In the management study, the percentage of benign lesions for which a close dermoscopic follow-up was suggested significantly decreased (51.6% versus 22.2%), in parallel with an increase in the number of lesions referred for RCM. As for malignant cases, the reduction in responses "close dermoscopic follow-up" decreased from 37.0% to 9.9%, (-27%), in favor of RCM (+15%) and skin biopsy (+12%).

conclusionsThe ophthalmologists proved to be very receptive in quickly metabolizing and putting into practice the concepts learned during the one-day intensive dermoscopy training course. Indeed, after only a one-day lesson, they were able to increase their SE by 9% and to improve their management strategy. The present findings highlight the importance of providing training ophthalmologists in dermoscopy during residency programs, in terms of benefits for the correct patient care.

Indexed as

dermoscopyeyelid skin lesionslentigo malignaophthalmologypigmented periorbital lesions

Identifiers

PMID39594236
PMCPMC11593280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.