ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Utilizing Artificial Intelligence for Microbiome Decision-Making: Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children from Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral microbiome dysbiosis in autism spectrum disorder: the oral-gut-brain axis and future perspectives: a narrative review.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Smart Microbiomes: How AI Is Revolutionizing Personalized Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe study of microbiome composition shows positive indications for application in the diagnosis and treatment of many conditions and diseases. One such condition is autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We aimed to analyze gut microbiome samples from children in Bosnia and Herzegovina to identify microbial differences between neurotypical children and those with ASD. Additionally, we developed machine learning classifiers to differentiate between the two groups using microbial abundance and predicted functional pathways.
methodsA total of 60 gut microbiome samples (16S rRNA sequences) were analyzed, with 44 from children with ASD and 16 from neurotypical children. Four machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Support Vector Classification, Gradient Boosting, and Extremely Randomized Tree Classifier) were applied to create eight classification models based on bacterial abundance at the genus level and KEGG pathways. Model accuracy was evaluated, and an external dataset was introduced to test model generalizability.
resultsThe highest classification accuracy (80%) was achieved with Random Forest and Extremely Randomized Tree Classifier using genus-level taxa. The Random Forest model also performed well (78%) with KEGG pathways. When tested on an independent dataset, the model maintained high accuracy (79%), confirming its generalizability.
conclusionsThis study identified significant microbial differences between neurotypical children and children with ASD. Machine learning classifiers, particularly Random Forest and Extremely Randomized Tree Classifier, achieved strong accuracy. Validation with external data demonstrated that the models could generalize across different datasets, highlighting their potential use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.