Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594182›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Diagnostic Applications of AI in Sports: A Comprehensive Review of Injury Risk Prediction Methods.

Carmina Liana Musat, Claudiu Mereuta, Aurel Nechita, Dana Tutunaru, Andreea Elena Voipan, Daniel Voipan, Elena Mereuta, Tudor Vladimir Gurau, Gabriela Gurău, Luiza Camelia Nechita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carmina Liana MusatFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Claudiu MereutaFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Aurel NechitaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Dana TutunaruFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Andreea Elena VoipanFaculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-9106-6076
Daniel VoipanFaculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0009-0001-8109-2888
Elena MereutaFaculty of Engineering, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4521-5622
Tudor Vladimir GurauFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Gabriela GurăuFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Luiza Camelia NechitaFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting and preventing sports injuries across various disciplines. By exploring the application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques, such as random forests (RFs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and artificial neural networks (ANNs), this review highlights AI's ability to analyze complex datasets, detect patterns, and generate predictive insights that enhance injury prevention strategies. AI models improve the accuracy and reliability of injury risk assessments by tailoring prevention strategies to individual athlete profiles and processing real-time data. A literature review was conducted through searches in PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science, focusing on studies from 2014 to 2024 and using keywords such as 'artificial intelligence', 'machine learning', 'sports injury', and 'risk prediction'. While AI's predictive power supports both team and individual sports, its effectiveness varies based on the unique data requirements and injury risks of each, with team sports presenting additional complexity in data integration and injury tracking across multiple players. This review also addresses critical issues such as data quality, ethical concerns, privacy, and the need for transparency in AI applications. By shifting the focus from reactive to proactive injury management, AI technologies contribute to enhanced athlete safety, optimized performance, and reduced human error in medical decisions. As AI continues to evolve, its potential to revolutionize sports injury prediction and prevention promises further advancements in athlete health and performance while addressing current challenges.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceindividual sportsinjury risk predictionmusculoskeletal injuriesprediction methodssports medicineteam sportstechnical review

Identifiers

PMID39594182
PMCPMC11592714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.