Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39594112›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Food Public Opinion Prevention and Control Model Based on Sentiment Analysis.

Leiyang Chen, Xiangzhen Peng, Liang Dong, Zhenyu Wang, Zhidong Shen, Xiaohui Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leiyang ChenKey Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7535-989X
Xiangzhen PengKey Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430001, China.
Liang DongKey Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430001, China.
Zhenyu WangKey Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430001, China.
Zhidong ShenKey Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4880-381X
Xiaohui CuiKey Laboratory of Aerospace Information Security and Trusted Computing, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430001, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6079-009X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food public opinion is characterized by its low ignition point, high diffusibility, persistence, and strong negativity, which significantly impact food safety and consumer trust. This paper introduces the Food Public Opinion Prevention and Control (FPOPC) model driven by deep learning and personalized recommendation algorithms, rigorously tested and analyzed through experimentation. Initially, based on an analysis of food public opinion development, a comprehensive FPOPC framework addressing all stages of food public opinion was established. Subsequently, a sentiment prediction model for food news based on user comments was developed using a Stacked Autoencoder (SAE), enabling predictions about consumer sentiments toward food news. The sentiment values of the food news were then quantified, and improvements were made in allocating Pearson correlation coefficient weights, leading to the design of a collaborative filtering-based personalized food news recommendation mechanism. Furthermore, an enhanced Bloom filter integrated with HDFS technology devised a rapid recommendation mechanism for food public opinion. Finally, the designed FPOPC model and its associated mechanisms were validated through experimental verification and simulation analysis. The results demonstrate that the FPOPC model can accurately predict and control the development of food public opinion and the entire food supply chain, providing regulatory agencies with effective tools for managing food public sentiment.

Indexed as

food public opinionfood safetypersonalized recommendationsSAEsentiment prediction

Identifiers

PMID39594112
PMCPMC11593908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.