ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Will Food Safety Incidents Stimulate the Public's Desire for Food Safety Governance?
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Consumer Purchase Intention for Pre-Prepared Meals Based on Random Forest and Explainable AI (SHAP): A Study in Jilin Province, China.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- China's criminal incidental civil public interest litigation in food safety: practice review and pathways to improvement.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Analysis of Factors Affecting Consumers' Perception of Food Safety Risks in the Prepared Food Market.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Spillover Effects of Food Safety Incidents: Role of Consumers' Heterogeneous Safety Preferences.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Microfluidic biosensors for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria: recent advances and future perspectives.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper, grounded in the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) model and event system theory, examines the mechanisms through which public recognition-specifically novel, disruptive, and critical recognition-of the intensity of food safety incidents influences willingness to engage in food safety governance. Risk perception is identified as a mediating variable, while risk communication serves as a moderating variable. Based on survey data, the study found that various forms of public recognition significantly impact governance willingness. Furthermore, risk perception plays a crucial mediating role, and risk communication has a notable moderating effect on the relationship between risk perception and food safety governance willingness. These findings illuminate the intrinsic connection between public recognition of food safety incidents and governance willingness, offering robust theoretical support and practical guidance for enhancing food safety governance. This research contributes to the ongoing improvement and optimization of food safety governance systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.