ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Novel Information Complexity Approach to Score Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Modeling.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based nomogram for predicting depressive symptoms in women: A cross-sectional study in Guangdong Province, China.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Performance metrics are measures of success or performance that can be used to evaluate how well a model makes accurate predictions or classifications. However, there is no single measure since each performance metric emphasizes a different classification aspect. Model selection procedures based on information criteria offer a quantitative measure that balances model complexity with goodness of fit, providing a better alternative to classical approaches. In this paper, we introduce and develop a novel Information Complexity-Receiver Operating Characteristic, abbreviated as ICOMP-ROC, criterion approach to fit and study the performance of ROC curve models. We construct and derive the Universal ROC (UROC) for a combination of sixteen Bi-distributional ROC models to choose the best Bi-distributional ROC by minimizing the ICOMP-ROC criterion. We conduct large-scale Monte Carlo simulations using the sixteen Bi-distributional ROC models with the Normal-Normal and Weibull-Gamma pairs as the pseudo-true ROC models. We report the frequency of hits of the ICOMP-ROC criterion, showing its remarkable recovery rate. In addition to Bi-distributional fitting, we consider a high-dimensional real Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the Brain dataset and Wisconsin Breast Cancer (WBC) dataset to study the performance of the common performance metrics and the ICOMP-ROC criterion using several machine learning (ML) classification algorithms. We use the genetic algorithm (GA) to reduce the dimensions of these two datasets to choose the best subset of the features to study and compare the performance of the newly proposed ICOMP-ROC criterion along with the traditional performance metrics. The choice of a suitable metric is not just contingent upon the ML model used, but it also depends upon the complexity and high dimensionality of the input datasets, since the traditional performance metrics give different results and have inherent limitations. Our numerical results show the consistency and reliability of the ICOMP-ROC criterion over the traditional performance metrics as a clever model selection criterion to choose the best fitting Bi-distributional ROC model and the best classification algorithm among the ones considered. This shows the utility and the versatility of our newly proposed approach in ROC curve modeling that integrates and robustifies currently used procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.