Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593899›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Model for Stock Price Prediction Using Quantum-Enhanced Long Short-Term Memory.

Kimleang Kea, Dongmin Kim, Chansreynich Huot, Tae-Kyung Kim, Youngsun Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimleang KeaDepartment of AI Convergence, Pukyong National University, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6236-1379
Dongmin KimDepartment of AI Convergence, Pukyong National University, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0320-9865
Chansreynich HuotDepartment of AI Convergence, Pukyong National University, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0001-3894-1530
Tae-Kyung KimDepartment of Management Information Systems, Chungbuk National University, Seowon-Gu, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9962-1066
Youngsun HanDepartment of AI Convergence, Pukyong National University, Nam-gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7712-2514

Funding

"Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)" through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2023RIS-007)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stock markets have become a popular topic within machine learning (ML) communities, with one particular application being stock price prediction. However, accurately predicting the stock market is a challenging task due to the various factors within financial markets. With the introduction of ML, prediction techniques have become more efficient but computationally demanding for classical computers. Given the rise of quantum computing (QC), which holds great promise for being exponentially faster than current classical computers, it is natural to explore ML within the QC domain. In this study, we leverage a hybrid quantum-classical ML approach to predict a company's stock price. We integrate classical long short-term memory (LSTM) with QC, resulting in a new variant called QLSTM. We initially validate the proposed QLSTM model by leveraging an IBM quantum simulator running on a classical computer, after which we conduct predictions using an IBM real quantum computer. Thereafter, we evaluate the performance of our model using the root mean square error (RMSE) and prediction accuracy. Additionally, we perform a comparative analysis, evaluating the prediction performance of the QLSTM model against several other classical models. Further, we explore the impacts of hyperparameters on the QLSTM model to determine the best configuration. Our experimental results demonstrate that while the classical LSTM model achieved an RMSE of 0.0693 and a prediction accuracy of 0.8815, the QLSTM model exhibited superior performance, achieving values of 0.0602 and 0.9736, respectively. Furthermore, the QLSTM outperformed other classical models in both metrics.

Indexed as

AI in financelong short-term memoryquantum machine learningstock price predictiontime-series analysis

Identifiers

PMID39593899
PMCPMC11592896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.