ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
AI-Driven Prediction of Symptom Trajectories in Cancer Care: A Deep Learning Approach for Chemotherapy Management.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and transforming cancer care.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Current methods for analyzing time-series patient-generated health data to assess treatment response: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Perception of AI Symptom Models in Oncology Nursing: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.JMIR nursing · 2026Article
- Development of a novel artificial intelligence algorithm for interpreting fetal heart rate and uterine activity data in cardiotocography.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Home Automated Telemanagement System for Individualized Exercise Programs: Design and Usability Evaluation.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an advanced method for predicting symptom escalation in chemotherapy patients using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). The accurate prediction of symptom escalation is critical in cancer care to enable timely interventions and improve symptom management to enhance patients' quality of life during treatment. The analytical dataset consists of daily self-reported symptom logs from chemotherapy patients, including a wide range of symptoms, such as nausea, fatigue, and pain. The original dataset was highly imbalanced, with approximately 84% of the data containing no symptom escalation. The data were resampled into varying interval lengths to address this imbalance and improve the model's ability to detect symptom escalation (n = 3 to n = 7 days). This allowed the model to predict significant changes in symptom severity across these intervals. The results indicate that shorter intervals (n = 3 days) yielded the highest overall performance, with the CNN model achieving an accuracy of 81%, precision of 87%, recall of 80%, and an F1 score of 83%. This was an improvement over the LSTM model, which had an accuracy of 79%, precision of 85%, recall of 79%, and an F1 score of 82%. The model's accuracy and recall declined as the interval length increased, though precision remained relatively stable. The findings demonstrate that both CNN's temporospatial feature extraction and LSTM's temporal modeling effectively capture escalation patterns in symptom progression. By integrating these predictive models into digital health systems, healthcare providers can offer more personalized and proactive care, enabling earlier interventions that may reduce symptom burden and improve treatment adherence. Ultimately, this approach has the potential to significantly enhance the overall quality of life for chemotherapy patients by providing real-time insights into symptom trajectories and guiding clinical decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.