Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593828›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Analysis of Umbilical Artery Hemodynamics in Development of Intrauterine Growth Restriction Using Computational Fluid Dynamics with Doppler Ultrasound.

Xue Song, Jingying Wang, Ke Sun, Chunhian Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xue SongSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061, China.
Jingying WangSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-3341
Ke SunSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061, China.
Chunhian LeeSchool of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Ji'nan 250061, China.

Funding

Young Scholars of Shandong University 31380082164048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), the failure of the fetus to achieve his/her growth potential, is a common and complex problem in pregnancy. Clinically, IUGR is usually monitored using Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery (UA). The Doppler waveform is generally divided into three typical patterns in IUGR development, from normal blood flow (Normal), to the loss of end diastolic blood flow (LDBF), and even to the reversal of end diastolic blood flow (RDBF). Unfortunately, Doppler ultrasound hardly provides complete UA hemodynamics in detail, while the present in silico computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can provide this with the necessary ultrasound information. In this paper, CFD is employed to simulate the periodic UA blood flow for three typical states of IUGR, which shows comprehensive information on blood flow velocity, pressure, and wall shear stress (WSS). A new finding is the "hysteresis effect" between the UA blood flow velocity and pressure drop in which the former always changes after the latter by 0.1-0.2 times a cardiac cycle due to the unsteady flow. The degree of hysteresis is a promising indicator characterizing the evolution of IUGR. CFD successfully shows the hemodynamic details in different development situations of IUGR, and undoubtedly, its results would also help clinicians to further understand the relationship between the UA blood flow status and fetal growth restriction.

Indexed as

blood flowcomputational fluid dynamics (CFD)Doppler ultrasoundintrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)umbilical artery (UA)

Identifiers

PMID39593828
PMCPMC11591627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.