ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Deciphering Membrane Proteins Through Deep Learning Models by Revealing Their Locale Within the Cell.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane proteins constitute essential biomolecules attached to or integrated into cellular and organelle membranes, playing diverse roles in cellular processes. Their precise localization is crucial for understanding their functions. Existing protein subcellular localization predictors are predominantly trained on globular proteins; their performance diminishes for membrane proteins, explicitly via deep learning models. To address this challenge, the proposed study segregates membrane proteins into three distinct locations, including the plasma membrane, internal membrane, and membrane of the organelle, using deep learning algorithms including recurrent neural networks (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). A redundancy-curtailed dataset of 3000 proteins from the MemLoci approach is selected for the investigation, along with incorporating pseudo amino acid composition (PseAAC). PseAAC is an exemplary technique for extracting protein information hidden in the amino acid sequences. After extensive testing, the results show that the accuracy for LSTM and RNN is 83.4% and 80.5%, respectively. The results show that the LSTM model outperforms the RNN and is most commonly employed in proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.