ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Automatic Segmentation and Evaluation of Mitral Regurgitation Using Doppler Echocardiographic Images.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Automated Classification of Mitral and Tricuspid Regurgitation With Explainability and Real-World Practice Experience.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMitral Regurgitation (MR) is a common heart valve disease. Severe MR can lead to pulmonary hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, and even death. Therefore, early diagnosis and assessment of MR severity are crucial. In this study, we propose a deep learning-based method for segmenting MR regions, aiming to improve the efficiency of MR severity classification and diagnosis.
methodsWe enhanced the Efficient Multi-Scale Attention (EMA) module to capture multi-scale features more effectively, thereby improving its segmentation performance on MR regions, which vary widely in size. A total of 367 color Doppler echocardiography images were acquired, with 293 images used for model training and 74 images for testing. To fully validate the capability of the improved EMA module, we use ResUNet as the backbone, partially integrating the enhanced EMA module into the decoder's upsampling process. The proposed model is then compared with classic models like Deeplabv3+ and PSPNet, as well as UNet, ResUNet, ResUNet with the original EMA module added, and UNet with the improved EMA module added.
resultsThe experimental results demonstrate that the model proposed in this study achieved the best performance for the segmentation of the MR region on the test dataset: Jaccard (84.37%), MPA (92.39%), Recall (90.91%), and Precision (91.9%). In addition, the classification of MR severity based on the segmentation mask generated by our proposed model also achieved acceptable performance: Accuracy (95.27%), Precision (88.52%), Recall (91.13%), and F1-score (90.30%).
conclusionThe model proposed in this study achieved accurate segmentation of MR regions, and based on its segmentation mask, automatic and accurate assessment of MR severity can be realized, potentially assisting radiologists and cardiologists in making decisions about MR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.