ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Effect of Structure on Osteogenesis of Bone Scaffold: Simulation Analysis Based on Mechanobiology and Animal Experiment Verification.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Porous scaffolds, whose mechanical and biological properties are greatly affected by structure, are new treatments for bone defects. Since bone repair is related to biomechanics, analyzing the osteogenesis in scaffolds based on mechanical stimulation may become a more effective method than traditional biological experiments. A tissue regeneration algorithm based on mechanical regulation theory was implemented in this study to evaluate the osteogenesis of classical scaffolds (Gyroid, I-WP, and Diamond). In vivo experiments were used to verify and supplement the simulation results. Different approaches to describing osteogenesis were discussed. Bone formation was more obvious inside the Gyroid scaffold and outside the I-WP scaffold, while the new bone was more sufficient and evenly distributed in the Diamond scaffold. The osteogenesis pattern of the bone scaffold in the simulation analysis was consistent with the results of animal experiments, and the bone volume calculated by the tissue fraction threshold method and the elastic modulus threshold method was very similar to the in vivo experiment. The mechanical responses mediated by structure affect the osteogenesis of bone scaffolds. This study provided and confirmed a simulation analysis method based on mechanical regulation theory, which is more efficient and economical for analyzing tissue healing in bioengineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.