Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593769›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Preprocessing and Denoising Techniques for Electrocardiography and Magnetocardiography: A Review.

Yifan Jia, Hongyu Pei, Jiaqi Liang, Yuheng Zhou, Yanfei Yang, Yangyang Cui, Min Xiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yifan JiaKey Laboratory of Ultra-Weak Magnetic Field Measurement Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7134-2110
Hongyu PeiKey Laboratory of Ultra-Weak Magnetic Field Measurement Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Jiaqi LiangKey Laboratory of Ultra-Weak Magnetic Field Measurement Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yuheng ZhouKey Laboratory of Ultra-Weak Magnetic Field Measurement Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yanfei YangKey Laboratory of Ultra-Weak Magnetic Field Measurement Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yangyang CuiState Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome, National Institute of Extremely-Weak Magnetic Field Infrastructure, Hangzhou 310028, China.
Min XiangKey Laboratory of Ultra-Weak Magnetic Field Measurement Technology, Ministry of Education, School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0239-3392

Funding

2022 Industrial Technology Basic Public Service Platform Project 2022 189-181Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology 2021ZD0300500Key R&D Programof Shandong Province 2022ZLGX03National Natural Science Foundation of China 62101017, U23A20485, 42388101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review systematically analyzes the latest advancements in preprocessing techniques for Electrocardiography (ECG) and Magnetocardiography (MCG) signals over the past decade. ECG and MCG play crucial roles in cardiovascular disease (CVD) detection, but both are susceptible to noise interference. This paper categorizes and compares different ECG denoising methods based on noise types, such as baseline wander (BW), electromyographic noise (EMG), power line interference (PLI), and composite noise. It also examines the complexity of MCG signal denoising, highlighting the challenges posed by environmental and instrumental interference. This review is the first to systematically compare the characteristics of ECG and MCG signals, emphasizing their complementary nature. MCG holds significant potential for improving the precision of CVD clinical diagnosis. Additionally, it evaluates the limitations of current denoising methods in clinical applications and outlines future directions, including the potential of explainable neural networks, multi-task neural networks, and the combination of deep learning with traditional methods to enhance denoising performance and diagnostic accuracy. In summary, while traditional filtering techniques remain relevant, hybrid strategies combining machine learning offer substantial potential for advancing signal processing and clinical diagnostics. This review contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive framework for selecting and improving denoising techniques, better facilitating signal quality enhancement and the accuracy of CVD diagnostics.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)denoising techniquesElectrocardiography (ECG)Magnetocardiography (MCG)signal preprocessing

Identifiers

PMID39593769
PMCPMC11591354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.