ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Enhancing Aerosol Mitigation in Medical Procedures: A CFD-Informed Respiratory Barrier Enclosure.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Portable, Foldable Negative-Pressure Aerosol-Containment System (FNPACS) for Aerosol Control During Aerosol-Generating Procedures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhanced Aerosol Containment Performance of a Negative Pressure Hood with an Aerodynamic Cap Design: Multi-Method Validation Using CFD, PAO Particles, and Microbial Testing.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A New Method Proposed for Analyzing Airflow Dynamics in Negative Pressure Isolation Chambers Using Particle Image Velocimetry.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significant infection risks posed by aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), such as intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Despite existing protective measures, high-risk environments like these require more effective safety solutions. In response, our research team has focused on developing a novel respiratory barrier enclosure designed to enhance the safety of healthcare workers and patients during AGPs. We developed a hood that covers the patient's respiratory area, incorporating a negative pressure system to contain aerosols. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis, we optimized the hood's design and adjusted the negative pressure levels based on simulations of droplet dispersion. To test the design, Polyalphaolefin (PAO) particles were generated inside the hood, and leakage was measured every 10 s for 90 s. The open side of the hood was divided into nine sections for consistent leakage measurements, and a standardized structure was implemented to ensure accuracy. Our target was to maintain a leakage rate of less than 0.3%, in line with established filter-testing criteria. Through iterative improvements based on leakage rates and intubation efficiency, we achieved significant results. Despite reducing the hood's size, the redesigned enclosure showed a 36.2% reduction in leakage rates and an approximately 3204.6% increase in aerosol extraction efficiency in simulations. The modified hood, even in an open configuration, maintained a droplet leakage rate of less than 0.3%. These findings demonstrate the potential of a CFD-guided design in developing respiratory barriers that effectively reduce aerosol transmission risks during high-risk medical procedures. This approach not only improves the safety of both patients and healthcare providers but also provides a scalable solution for safer execution of AGPs in various healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.