ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Machine Learning Models for Tracking Blood Loss and Resuscitation in a Hemorrhagic Shock Swine Injury Model.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing Trauma Care: Machine Learning-Based Photoplethysmography Analysis for Estimating Blood Volume During Hemorrhage and Resuscitation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemorrhage leading to life-threatening shock is a common and critical problem in both civilian and military medicine. Due to complex physiological compensatory mechanisms, traditional vital signs may fail to detect patients' impending hemorrhagic shock in a timely manner when life-saving interventions are still viable. To address this shortcoming of traditional vital signs in detecting hemorrhagic shock, we have attempted to identify metrics that can predict blood loss. We have previously combined feature extraction and machine learning methodologies applied to arterial waveform analysis to develop advanced metrics that have enabled the early and accurate detection of impending shock in a canine model of hemorrhage, including metrics that estimate blood loss such as the Blood Loss Volume Metric, the Percent Estimated Blood Loss metric, and the Hemorrhage Area metric. Importantly, these metrics were able to identify impending shock well before traditional vital signs, such as blood pressure, were altered enough to identify shock. Here, we apply these advanced metrics developed using data from a canine model to data collected from a swine model of controlled hemorrhage as an interim step towards showing their relevance to human medicine. Based on the performance of these advanced metrics, we conclude that the framework for developing these metrics in the previous canine model remains applicable when applied to a swine model and results in accurate performance in these advanced metrics. The success of these advanced metrics in swine, which share physiological similarities to humans, shows promise in developing advanced blood loss metrics for humans, which would result in increased positive casualty outcomes due to hemorrhage in civilian and military medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.