ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Improving EEG Forward Modeling Using High-Resolution Five-Layer BEM-FMM Head Models: Effect on Source Reconstruction Accuracy.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charge based boundary element method with residual driven adaptive mesh refinement for high resolution electrical stimulation modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Forward model of rat electroencephalogram: influence of inhomogeneous and anisotropic skull.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Charge Based Boundary Element Method with Residual Driven Adaptive Mesh Refinement for High Resolution Electrical Stimulation Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Improved Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Fields using Reciprocal BEM-FMM.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Inferring neural sources from electroencephalography: foundations and frontiers.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Review
- High-definition MEG source estimation using the reciprocal boundary element fast multipole method.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Head-Specific Spatial Spectra of Electroencephalography Explained: A Sphara and BEM Investigation.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Article
- Fast and Accurate EEG/MEG BEM-Based Forward Problem Solution for High-Resolution Head Models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization is a fundamental tool for clinical diagnoses and brain-computer interfaces. We investigate the impact of model complexity on reconstruction accuracy by comparing the widely used three-layer boundary element method (BEM) as an inverse method against a five-layer BEM accelerated by the fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) and coupled with adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) as forward solver. Modern BEM-FMM with AMR can solve high-resolution multi-tissue models efficiently and accurately. We generated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 15 subjects in the Connectome Young Adult dataset, using four anatomically relevant dipole positions, three conductivity sets, and two head segmentations; we mapped localization errors across the entire grey matter from 4000 dipole positions. The average location error among our four selected dipoles is ∼5mm (±2mm) with an orientation error of ∼12∘ (±7∘). The average source localization error across the entire grey matter is ∼9mm (±4mm), with a tendency for smaller errors on the occipital lobe. Our findings indicate that while three-layer models are robust under noiseless conditions, substantial localization errors (10-20mm) are common. Therefore, models of five or more layers may be needed for accurate source reconstruction in critical applications involving noisy EEG data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.