Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593731›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Improving EEG Forward Modeling Using High-Resolution Five-Layer BEM-FMM Head Models: Effect on Source Reconstruction Accuracy.

Guillermo Nuñez Ponasso, William A Wartman, Ryan C McSweeney, Peiyao Lai, Jens Haueisen, Burkhard Maess, Thomas R Knösche, Konstantin Weise, Gregory M Noetscher, Tommi Raij and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Guillermo Nuñez PonassoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2938-6782
William A WartmanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7286-3313
Ryan C McSweeneyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.
Peiyao LaiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6995-5302
Jens HaueisenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3871-2890
Burkhard MaessMax Plank Insititute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-291X
Thomas R KnöscheMax Plank Insititute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9668-3261
Konstantin WeiseMax Plank Insititute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1283-2042
Gregory M NoetscherDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9786-7206
Tommi RaijAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Sergey N MakaroffDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0478-8248

Funding

Re-Wiring the Human BrainR01NS126337 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Tommi Raij · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
Charge-Based Brain Modeling Engine with Boundary Element Fast Multipole MethodR01MH130490 · NIMH · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI Sergey N Makaroff · 2023 to 2026
$3.3M
CRSNS: Development of EEG/MEG Source Reconstruction with Fast Multipole MethodR01EB035484 · NIBIB · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI Sergey N Makaroff · 2023 to 2026
$777k
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GQ2201Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GQ2304AEuropean Regional Development Fund 2018 IZN 004Free State of Thuringia 2018 IZN 004NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB035484NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB035484NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH130490NIMH NIH HHS R01MH130490NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS126337NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS126337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalographic (EEG) source localization is a fundamental tool for clinical diagnoses and brain-computer interfaces. We investigate the impact of model complexity on reconstruction accuracy by comparing the widely used three-layer boundary element method (BEM) as an inverse method against a five-layer BEM accelerated by the fast multipole method (BEM-FMM) and coupled with adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) as forward solver. Modern BEM-FMM with AMR can solve high-resolution multi-tissue models efficiently and accurately. We generated noiseless 256-channel EEG data from 15 subjects in the Connectome Young Adult dataset, using four anatomically relevant dipole positions, three conductivity sets, and two head segmentations; we mapped localization errors across the entire grey matter from 4000 dipole positions. The average location error among our four selected dipoles is ∼5mm (±2mm) with an orientation error of ∼12∘ (±7∘). The average source localization error across the entire grey matter is ∼9mm (±4mm), with a tendency for smaller errors on the occipital lobe. Our findings indicate that while three-layer models are robust under noiseless conditions, substantial localization errors (10-20mm) are common. Therefore, models of five or more layers may be needed for accurate source reconstruction in critical applications involving noisy EEG data.

Indexed as

adaptative mesh refinement (AMR)boundary element method (BEM)brain imagingEEG dipole reconstructionEEG source analysiselectroencephalography (EEG)fast multipole method (FMM)

Identifiers

PMID39593731
PMCPMC11591057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.