ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Predicting Deep Venous Thrombosis Using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Data Approach.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning for Predicting Venous Thromboembolism After Joint Arthroplasty: Systematic Review of Clinical Applicability and Model Performance.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Pooled it
- Application of machine learning models in predicting the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning algorithm enables lower limb venous thrombosis detection with CT venography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Risk Prediction of Low Bone Density in Elderly Patients with Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms.Balkan medical journal · 2025Article
- The Role of Early Rehabilitation in Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Predicting periprosthetic joint Infection: Evaluating supervised machine learning models for clinical application.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in risk assessment and management of venous thromboembolism: scoping review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep venous thrombosis is a critical medical condition that occurs when a blood clot forms in a deep vein, usually in the legs, and can lead to life-threatening complications such as pulmonary embolism if not detected early. Hospitalized patients, especially those with immobility or post-surgical recovery, are at higher risk of developing deep venous thrombosis, making early prediction and intervention vital for preventing severe outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the following eight machine learning models to predict deep venous thrombosis risk: logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, artificial neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, gradient boosting, CatBoost, and LightGBM. These models were rigorously tested using key metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve, to determine their effectiveness in clinical prediction. Logistic regression emerged as the top-performing model, delivering high accuracy and an outstanding receiver operating characteristic curve score, which reflects its strong ability to distinguish between patients with and without deep venous thrombosis. Most importantly, the model's high recall underscores its ability to identify nearly all true deep venous thrombosis cases, significantly reducing the risk of false negatives-a critical concern in clinical settings, where delayed or missed diagnoses can result in life-threatening complications. Although models such as random forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting also demonstrated competitive performances, logistic regression proved the most reliable across all metrics. These results suggest that machine learning models, particularly logistic regression, have great potential for early deep venous thrombosis detection, enabling timely clinical interventions and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.