Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593727›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Predicting Deep Venous Thrombosis Using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Data Approach.

Aurelian-Dumitrache Anghele, Virginia Marina, Liliana Dragomir, Cosmina Alina Moscu, Mihaela Anghele, Catalin Anghel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aurelian-Dumitrache AngheleDepartment of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 47 Str. Domnească, 800201 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-6669-1398
Virginia MarinaMedical Department of Occupational Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 47 Str. Domnească, 800201 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-734X
Liliana DragomirClinical-Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 47 Str. Domnească, 800201 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5919-3941
Cosmina Alina MoscuEmergency Department, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 800201 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5837-306X
Mihaela AngheleClinical-Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 47 Str. Domnească, 800201 Galati, Romania.
Catalin AnghelDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 2 Științei St., 800146 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-3072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep venous thrombosis is a critical medical condition that occurs when a blood clot forms in a deep vein, usually in the legs, and can lead to life-threatening complications such as pulmonary embolism if not detected early. Hospitalized patients, especially those with immobility or post-surgical recovery, are at higher risk of developing deep venous thrombosis, making early prediction and intervention vital for preventing severe outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the following eight machine learning models to predict deep venous thrombosis risk: logistic regression, random forest, XGBoost, artificial neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, gradient boosting, CatBoost, and LightGBM. These models were rigorously tested using key metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve, to determine their effectiveness in clinical prediction. Logistic regression emerged as the top-performing model, delivering high accuracy and an outstanding receiver operating characteristic curve score, which reflects its strong ability to distinguish between patients with and without deep venous thrombosis. Most importantly, the model's high recall underscores its ability to identify nearly all true deep venous thrombosis cases, significantly reducing the risk of false negatives-a critical concern in clinical settings, where delayed or missed diagnoses can result in life-threatening complications. Although models such as random forest and eXtreme Gradient Boosting also demonstrated competitive performances, logistic regression proved the most reliable across all metrics. These results suggest that machine learning models, particularly logistic regression, have great potential for early deep venous thrombosis detection, enabling timely clinical interventions and improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in medical diagnosisdeep venous thrombosismachine learningmachine learning models in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID39593727
PMCPMC11590985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.