ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Composites of Polylactic Acid with Diatomaceous Earth for 3D-Printing Biocompatible Scaffolds: A Systematic Study of Their Mechanical, Thermal, and Biocompatibility Properties.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the development of biocompatible scaffolds for bone regeneration, utilizing polylactic acid (PLA) combined with calcium phosphate as a pH buffer and diatomaceous earth as a biocompatibilizer. These materials were extruded and 3D-printed to enhance cell adhesion and biodegradability after enough cell growth. The biocompatibility of the resulting composites, with different proportions of the components and sterilization methods, was tested according to the ISO 10993 protocol. The optimal performance, with nearly zero cytotoxicity, was observed with 20 PLA/1 CP/1 DE mass ratios and gamma sterilization. Tension analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were applied to the 3D-printed composites, which were also analyzed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to understand the origin of the tension properties better, which were comparable to those of cancellous bone. Degradation tests under physiological conditions for 13 weeks showed no significant mass loss. Furthermore, it was observed that cell adhesion, viability, proliferation, and osteoconduction are possible in the scaffolds studied, opening opportunities for future studies to substantiate the use of 3D-printed silica-filled composites as an alternative to homologous implants for various bone regeneration applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.