ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Critical Design Considerations for Longer-Term Wear and Comfort of On-Body Medical Devices.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Novel Technology and the Internet of Medical Things.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Flexible Polymer-Based Electronics for Human Health Monitoring: A Safety-Level-Oriented Review of Materials and Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The commercialization of a growing number of wearable devices has been enabled within recent years due to the availability of miniaturized sensor modalities, the development of new materials, and the scalability of flexible electronics. With the increase in resource shortages within healthcare, there is a demand to translate wearable devices from the commercial consumer stand-point to the medical field. Clinical-grade signal quality, wearability, and comfort all need to be tailored to a wearable design. Wear and comfort for user compliance and durability for longer-term use are commonly overlooked. In this study, the relationship of on-body location and material layer composition is investigated. Five non-woven medical tapes noted for longer wear time are tested over a 7-day timeframe. The impact of material properties, such as elasticity, isotropy, and hysteresis, as well as the moisture vapor transmission rate (MVTR) and adhesive thickness, are evaluated in relation to skin properties on the lower torso of 30, high-activity-level volunteers. User perception was quantified via Likert-scale questionnaires and images were obtained for the material-skin interaction. The results indicate that critical characteristics, such as MVTR and elasticity, noted for positive skin interaction in commercial products, may not translate to improved user perception and durability over time. Future work will assess new design options to manipulate material properties for improved wear and comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.