ArticleJournal of midwifery & women's health
Development and Testing of the Comprehensive Prenatal Care Index: Relationship With Preterm Birth and Small for Gestational Age Across Racial and Ethnic Groups.
Article in Journal of midwifery & women's health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the Adequacy of Prenatal Care With Different Evaluation Indices Using Maternal and Fetal Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2026Article
- Integrating socioeconomic determinants into preterm birth risk prediction: evidence from Northwest China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Interventions to address inequities in infant mortality and morbidity in the NICU and beyond: A focus on the mother-infant dyad.Seminars in perinatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) are significant public health concerns in the United States, with pronounced disparities across racial and ethnic groups. Traditional prenatal care adequacy indices have limitations in fully capturing their multifaceted nature. Our study introduces the Comprehensive Prenatal Care Index (CPCI) to provide a more holistic assessment of prenatal care by integrating key elements of prenatal counseling and health promotion.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2016-2021 data. The CPCI was developed based on a comprehensive literature review, incorporating components such as timing, frequency, and content of prenatal visits. The index was validated using Item Response Theory (IRT) and compared with the Kotelchuck and Kessner Indices.
resultsThe study included 139,181 pregnant women. The CPCI demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.75; ω total, 0.81). IRT analysis confirmed the index's ability to capture variability in the quality of prenatal care, with item difficulty parameters ranging from -2.93 to +2.10. CPCI scores were significantly associated with reduced odds of adverse birth outcomes. Adequate CPCI care was linked to a 63% reduction in the odds of preterm birth among non-Hispanic White women, with similar reductions observed in Hispanic women (odds ratio [OR], 0.59) and Asian women (OR, 0.38). For SGA, adequate care was protective among non-Hispanic White (OR, 0.86) and Hispanic women (OR, 0.82) but showed mixed results in other groups. DISCUSSION: The CPCI provides a more inclusive measure of the quality of prenatal care compared with traditional indices. The study's findings suggest a significant role of comprehensive prenatal care in reducing adverse birth outcomes and addressing racial and ethnic disparities. Future research should focus on refining the CPCI and exploring its applicability in diverse populations to inform targeted and culturally sensitive prenatal care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.