Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39593190›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024

Heparan sulfate in cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker to assess disease severity and for treatment monitoring in patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: a position statement.

Roberto Giugliani, Ana Cecília Menezes de Siqueira, Emerson Santana Santos, Emília Katiane E A Leão, Gerson da Silva Carvalho, Mara Lúcia Schmitz Ferreira Santos, Salmo Raskin, Ana Maria Martins

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberto GiuglianiUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2350, Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brasil. rgiugliani@hcpa.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0001-9655-3686
Ana Cecília Menezes de SiqueiraInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil.
Emerson Santana SantosUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Lagarto, Brazil.
Emília Katiane E A LeãoHospital Universitário Professor Edgard Santos, Salvador, Brazil.
Gerson da Silva CarvalhoCentro de Referência em Doenças Raras, Hospital de Apoio de Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Mara Lúcia Schmitz Ferreira SantosHospital Pequeno Príncipe, Curitiba, Brazil.
Salmo RaskinCentro de Aconselhamento e Laboratório Genetika, Curitiba, Brazil.
Ana Maria MartinsCentro de Referência em Erros Inatos do Metabolismo, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

JCR Pharmaceuticals JCR Pharmaceuticals
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) can present with a severe neuronopathic phenotype or an attenuated non-neuronopathic phenotype. In the light of the recent development of drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier for treatment of neurologic MPS II symptoms, it is critical to define biomarkers that objectively differentiate phenotypes and monitor therapeutic outcomes of advanced treatments. In December 2023, a panel of Brazilian experts discussed the potential of quantifying heparan sulfate (HS) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a biomarker for assessing neurological impairment in patients with MPS II, as well as the potential of the molecule as an objective parameter for therapeutic monitoring. Based on scientific evidence, the experts concluded that HS in CSF is predominantly derived from the brain and reflects neurological impairment in patients with MPS II. CSF HS levels may help differentiate between neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic forms of MPS II, with preliminary observations suggesting a potential threshold around 4,000 ng/mL when HS quantification is performed using the same method described in clinical studies of pabinafusp alfa. According to the authors, monitoring HS levels in CSF can serve as an objective parameter for assessing the effectiveness of treatment with drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier. The recommended timing of HS evaluations in CSF of patients with the severe phenotype is: (i) before treatment; (ii) six months after starting treatment; and (iii) two years after starting treatment. The same monitoring scheme is recommended for patients with the attenuated MPS II phenotype, however, after two years of treatment, the physician may elect to perform regular neurocognitive evaluations instead of measuring HS in CSF. Lastly, the authors reinforced the importance of evaluating adherence to treatment, including interruptions, to provide a more meaningful assessment of the treatment's real-world impact and to determine the ideal timing of CSF collection for therapeutic monitoring.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHeparan SulfateMucopolysaccharidosis IIHumansSeverity of Illness IndexBiomarkersHeparan SulfateBiomarkersBlood-brain barrierCerebrospinal fluidHeparan sulfateMucopolysaccharidosis type II

Identifiers

PMID39593190
PMCPMC11590453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.