ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Heparan sulfate in cerebrospinal fluid as a biomarker to assess disease severity and for treatment monitoring in patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: a position statement.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Location matters for brain gene therapy in lysosomal disorders.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Role of Biomarkers in Diagnosing Disease, Assessing the Severity and Progression of Disease, and Evaluating the Efficacy of Therapies.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) can present with a severe neuronopathic phenotype or an attenuated non-neuronopathic phenotype. In the light of the recent development of drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier for treatment of neurologic MPS II symptoms, it is critical to define biomarkers that objectively differentiate phenotypes and monitor therapeutic outcomes of advanced treatments. In December 2023, a panel of Brazilian experts discussed the potential of quantifying heparan sulfate (HS) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a biomarker for assessing neurological impairment in patients with MPS II, as well as the potential of the molecule as an objective parameter for therapeutic monitoring. Based on scientific evidence, the experts concluded that HS in CSF is predominantly derived from the brain and reflects neurological impairment in patients with MPS II. CSF HS levels may help differentiate between neuronopathic and non-neuronopathic forms of MPS II, with preliminary observations suggesting a potential threshold around 4,000 ng/mL when HS quantification is performed using the same method described in clinical studies of pabinafusp alfa. According to the authors, monitoring HS levels in CSF can serve as an objective parameter for assessing the effectiveness of treatment with drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier. The recommended timing of HS evaluations in CSF of patients with the severe phenotype is: (i) before treatment; (ii) six months after starting treatment; and (iii) two years after starting treatment. The same monitoring scheme is recommended for patients with the attenuated MPS II phenotype, however, after two years of treatment, the physician may elect to perform regular neurocognitive evaluations instead of measuring HS in CSF. Lastly, the authors reinforced the importance of evaluating adherence to treatment, including interruptions, to provide a more meaningful assessment of the treatment's real-world impact and to determine the ideal timing of CSF collection for therapeutic monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.